Words of Jesus Christ in "Red" ![]() Romans 14:1-4 In this section Paul considers the Church of God. One of the greatest stumbling blocks in the Church, in any age, has been judgment and condemnation "between the saints". Some saints, stronger in the faith, are able in spiritual liberty to "eat all things"; whereas the younger saints are unable to eat but a few "herbs" for their faith is weak. Paul encourages us in the first verse to "receive" the week in the faith, but "not to doubtful disputations". This is the Greek "DIAKRISIS DIALOGISMOS", which translated means "a judgment of faith or inward belief, disposition". We are to receive the weaker in the faith into the fold, "not casting judgment on them", as "God alone" is their Judge.
We are to "refuse to judge one another" in the Body for two reasons:
"A point in question:" if we see a brother in what we think is sin, do we refuse to say anything to him, fearing that we might be sitting in judgment? The answer is -- NO! We studied earlier the following text of Scripture relating to the ''sin unto death'':
This text is "not saying" that one brother should just "ask God" to forgive another brother for a sin that he might be in. We know that the Scripture does not allow forgiveness by proxy. The verse is telling us that if we see a brother in sin we should "go to that brother", and by this action perhaps lead him out from the trap of that sin. By correcting our brethren in sinful error, we may save that brother from sin unto death. There is a fine distinction "between judgment and correction". Besides, if you see a brother in sin "you know that he is in sin if his actions are contrary to Scriptural teaching". Often we judge one another in the Church without Scriptural basis. We condemn and nag because someone has a different spiritual perspective and we want them to be like us. "These things should not be!" Unless your brother is violating the Biblical norm, keep your opinions to yourself. We see this in our Romans text: It is a bad characteristic for the stronger Christian to forget those in his periphery may be weaker in the faith, to forget that "he was once weaker, too". "Despise" is the Greek "EXOUTHENEO", meaning "To treat with contempt". The stronger should not treat the weaker brother with contempt, for we were all weak in the faith at one time in our spiritual journey. This clause is directed "toward the younger brother's" attitude toward the older. The word "judge" is the Greek "KRINO", here used to mean "to criticize". The weaker usually criticizes the stronger, for the weaker, in his ignorance, "does not understand" the liberty that the Cross gave us. It is the weaker who often upholds the legalistic theories, which are completely of the world, while holding himself righteousness. I have heard it said in legalistic Churches, "those (Baptists, Presbyterians, Methodists) will believe anything". The weaker brother "can be the biggest bully" in the universe, so the stronger should be patient and not treat him with contempt. In verse 4 Paul asks, "Servant" here is the Greek "OIKETES", which means "a household slave". We "are all the slaves of God", and have no authority or right to criticize one another. We each stand justified or condemned before God. "Let Him be the Judge".
Some have read these verses and felt that Paul was teaching that it was fine to be legalistic. This is not the point he is making.
Paul was not teaching that it was fine or all right to be legalistic, but he was teaching that it was perfectly all right "to be temporarily weak". When we were born again we were babies that needed to grow spiritually. No one expects an infant to walk, talk, and act as if he were fully grown. We "must allow the weaker his time of growth". The stronger should not expect the weaker to fully understand Christian liberty. All are accountable to God, and God will judge both the stronger and the weaker, leading each person by His precious Holy Spirit. We need to be patient, to grow together in love. As long as both parties, both stronger and weaker, have the interests of their Lord at heart then God will bless their efforts.
In the first clause Paul highlights that "we are not masters of either our lives or of our deaths". "For none of us liveth to himself, and no man dieth to himself." The entire purpose, our ultimate goal as Christians, is to worship and serve God. The Stoics, a philosophical sect, felt that they were "masters of their souls and captains of their fates". "No man" has ever asked to be born, and no man can control when he dies:
Another interesting thing about the context is that it tells us that Christ's death and resurrection was accomplished in order to "give him Lordship" over creation. We see this further expressed:
All Christians will, after the great resurrection day known as "the Rapture", be judged at the Judgment Seat of Christ. We see this taught in:
We who are saved by Grace "are not saved from judgment", but we are saved "from eternal damnation". It is important that we understand this! We are not to judge one another for one day we shall be judged, having to give an account of our stewardship to the Lord Jesus. We will have to explain "how we used our stewardships" while Christians. "Give account" is the Greek "DOSEI LOGON", meaning "to refer to a bookkeeper's accounting ledger". "It is important to realize that we will not be condemned" at the Judgment seat of Christ, but all the work we did in this life "will be tested". If our works do not stand the test then we will receive no reward (other than salvation, which was secured at the Cross). If our works stand the test we will receive crowns, which will glorify the Plan of God and the work of the Son.
We are not condemned at the Judgment seat of Christ, though our stewardship of what God entrusted to us at salvation is "accounted for". We should not judge one another's stewardship before the proper judge, Jesus Christ, judges them at "the proper time". This is the main point Paul is making.
Paul now addresses the "gray areas" of sin. We all know that adultery, murder, theft, and so forth is sinful. These things are plainly highlighted in Scripture. But eating meat offered to idols, is this sinful? There are gray areas not mentioned in Scripture which are left up to us to determine whether it is sin or not. Though no meat or drink is "unclean of itself", if your action causes a brother to stumble then the action becomes "unclean because of the result". "Unclean" is the Greek "KOINON", meaning "that which is opposed to the Divine". "Anything which causes someone to stumble is unclean", opposed to God's Plan. It is God's will that we love one another and not cause any to stumble.
In verse 15 the "responsibility for removing stumbling blocks" relies on the older or stronger brother. This verse can be paralleled with:
The burden of non-offensiveness "is placed on the stronger" believer in Christ. The weaker brother often cannot help himself, much like an infant must be helped by someone older. The younger in Christ must be helped by the matured believers in the Church. Though Paul placed the injunction on the "weaker not to judge the stronger", the stronger Christian has the "heavier burden". Christ, in the parable of the unfaithful servant, gave the following rule for stewardship:
"Unto whomsoever much is given, of him shall be much required" refers to the mature Christian who, in growing, understands the Divine Law of Liberty. As the mature has been given much, God expects more from him than He does from the immature believer. The elder "must serve" the younger, willingly and out of love. In the phrase "Destroy not him with thy meat" we see the seriousness of the mature Christian's responsibility. In an earlier lesson we looked at the Doctrine of the Sin unto Death, noting that "any habitual unconfessed sin" can cause a believer meet an untimely death. We read:
If we see a brother in sin (as clearly outlined in the Scriptures), by going to that brother we may redeem or save him from physical death. The reverse is also true, as seen in our paralleled Romans and Corinthians texts, "Destroy not him with thy meat". If we who are Christians cast a stumbling block before a weaker brother, we may "cause him to feel that he has sinned". Feeling that he has fallen out of fellowship by eating "meat", he may then, in despair, "turn to actual sin." This may lead to habitual sin or the Sin unto Death. The mature Christian who is careless with his freedom may start a chain reaction which will cause the weaker to be destroyed. The mature Christian "has a terrible responsibility" to avoid offending the weaker. We need to keep this constantly in mind.
"Follow" is the Greek "DIOKO", meaning "to run swiftly in order to catch, to seek after eagerly". The idea is that the Christian should "diligently seek to create peace" in the Body of Christ. This is not an passive action, but a vibrant and active role that we must "each" take. Another interesting point can be drawn from the sentence: "It is good neither to eat flesh, nor to drink wine". Let's take a look at the Biblical aspect of Christians drinking alcohol. It is often said in many of our denominations that "the Christian is forbidden to partake of alcohol". Some Churches have Covenants specifying that believers are forbidden to partake, sell, or give alcohol to anyone. "I myself personally despise Church Covenants, for they are often prone to the whims of the democracy and totally devoid of Biblical truth." Many have been created as a tool by the weaker brother to despise the stronger, or by the stronger to condemn the weaker. Covenants are "often used in place" of the Scripture, providing the audience of the Church an opportunity to say what they like without really seeing what the Bible teaches. The Covenant forbidding alcohol is based on Scripture taken out of context in order to satisfy the world view of "religious behavior". First let me state that "I do not" drink alcohol. I refrain much as Paul did, to avoid offending my brother. But "not because" it is forbidden to me. The Scripture teaches of all things, even alcohol:
Jesus, in His earthly teaching ministry, "never taught" that the Christian was to abstain from any form of food or drink. He looked at the heart of the man, and taught that "that which came from the mouth" (our words from our hearts) defiled a man (his body, which is the temple of the Holy Spirit), because the words were "a true indicator of the inward condition" of that man. We can go a step further and note that: "no where" in Scripture are we taught "not" to drink alcohol. The Romans, Titus, and Corinthians passages make it plain that the Christian has spiritual liberty insofar as food and drink are concerned. Many evangelicals are fond of quoting the following passages in an effort to prove that "imbibing" (drinking alcohol) is wrong:
I draw your attention to the Proverbs passage first, which states "whosoever is deceived thereby". To be "deceived" by alcohol is to "drink unto drunkenness", not to partake in a moderate manner. No scholar of the Hebrew text would seek to prove that this passage teaches against drinking. It teaches "against drunkenness". The same is true of the Ephesians text, which teaches against drunkenness ("be not drunk"), not drinking. So why do many preachers teach the opposite intent of these texts? Because many cling to Galatianistic Legalism, not trusting the power of God to uphold the Christian. Jesus, according to the Bible, drank wine. This was a common practice among all Jewish people of this time.
Jesus, by drinking and eating with publicans and sinners, opened himself up to false charges of alcoholism and obesity. Many evangelicals try to tone the Biblical truths on alcohol down by saying "Jesus was just drinking grape juice", but He was obviously drinking mildly alcoholic wine if the Pharisees could bring the charge of "winebibber" out with a straight face. "There had to be the remotest possibility" that what they said was true if it was to be an effective slander. The Pharisees were "not" fools. If Jesus was only drinking grape juice they would have known it, and attacked Him in some other way. Jesus, scripturally, gave others wine during a wedding feast:
At his mothers request He turned the barrels of water into wine. And this was not just "grape juice" or some breakfast drink, for the Greek word for wine here refers to fermented alcohol. If drinking alcohol is wrong, then Jesus, by his actions, became the merchant of sin. Yet this is not so! Many preachers, though Biblical expositors, rarely study the historic background of the Scriptures. Historically the Jewish people, from Abraham till today, have drunk wine with their meals. This was often the case because water sources were often tainted, unfit for human consumption. This brings us to the point of the Lord's supper.
The Passover Supper, from which came the Lords Supper, traditionally was held with wine, the fruit of the vine, as it's beverage or symbolic "blood of the Lord". It was not until more recent times that the cup of the Lord "became grape juice". This is evident when we see the admonition that Paul gave the Corinthians in our text. He rebuked these Christians for improperly partaking of the Lord's table in greed, eating and drinking wine unto excess. He "did not condemn the church for use of alcoholic beverages, but of it's overuse", for "another is drunken". Now, I am not saying that all churches should turn from using grape juice to alcohol at the Lord's table. The Lord's table is symbolic, and in it's symbolism and in the spirit of Love we worship the Lord. If we partake using wine, orange juice, grape juice, or whatever; and do it "in the remembrance of Christ", then we honor His table. I do advocate that Christians "everywhere refrain from vain legalism" that edifies neither the Body nor the Spirit of God. I also encourage Christians to avoid creeds and covenants apart from Scripture. The Bible is our guide in Godly living, not some document written "by popular vote" in the local Church.
Many people feel that the chapter divisions were placed in the Bible by God. This is not true. The chapter, verse division, and even punctuation was placed in the Scriptures and standardized by translators. In most cases the chapter divisions are accurate to the subject, though in this case it is not. The first three verses of chapter 15 belong to chapter 14 as "it's conclusion and summary". "Infirmities" is the Greek "ASTHENEMA", which means "physical or mental weakness". The stronger brethren are to understand and "allow for" the weaker faith of their younger brethren. Paul makes it plain that this is "not just a suggestion or request, but stands as a command" from God. We see this in the Greek "OPHEILO" ("ought") which means "to be a debtor under obligation, bound to a duty". Paul also reckons the elder's job is "not a light one" in his use of the word "bear" "BASTAZO", which means to "hold up that which is burdensome". We are to "hold up or to bear up under" the weaknesses of our younger brethren, knowing that this will edify the church of Christ. Paul draws our minds to the sacrifice of Christ. Though Christ cried "my Father, if it be thy will, let this cup pass from me" (the cup of suffering); he nevertheless said after this, "not my will but thine be done". "Christ bore up under our infirmities, thus bringing us to salvation. Likewise we, as our duty, must bear up under others who are weak also." ![]() Click Here! Click Here!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Send E-mail to Russ: webslave for Christ ( Click Here ) with questions or comments about this web site and it's content. Last modified: 4/10/2007 |